Pollution of the sea by plastic garbage (January 2022)
In the post about invasive sea species discussed last month, I said
that this significant problem had been shadowed by the latest
Climate Change Conference (COP 26), which focused only on
greenhouse gas emissions.
Another problem insufficiently highlighted that is more urgent than
the greenhouse effect is the pollution of the sea by plastic garbages.
It is evident that merely observing rivers, lakes, and seasides of
many countries allow us to be aware of the magnitude of the
disaster, particularly if we take into consideration that what we can
see is only the emerging side of the iceberg: As an example, during
seabed surveys for the installation of new jackets in areas far from
the shore and active oilfields, I realized that the presence of debris,
which the majority were composed of plastic, was elevated, and that
there should not have been any of them in such a place. For this
reason, I consider that we have reached the ultimate limit and that
the measures applied by some states for more than 20 years are
unfortunately insufficient to contain this nuisance. To have a
panoramic view of this pollution and better understand its
progression and the efforts made to stop it, I suggest reading the
articles offered below:
In conclusion of these articles, we can say that, despite tremendous
efforts made by goodwill people and some organizations, the
recovery and treatment of plastics residues sent to the sea remain
insufficient due to the reduced means of collecting and treatment
provided.
Also, even though ingenious systems for collecting floating debris
have been developed, it seems that no industrial tool exists for the
recovery of those already on the bottom of the sea, which obliges to
recover them one by one until more efficient methods are invented.
The main reasons for the disinterest in this problem by the
mainstream press and finance community is, like for invasive
species, the fact that this market is less profitable than the one
arising from greenhouse gas emissions, and the fact that these
people do not realize that if the sea becomes a garbage bin as it is
the case of some rivers and lakes where fish have disappeared,
entire populations will not survive. We can also consider that many
official institutions fail to establish relevant priorities.
Nevertheless, these websites also show us that some high-diffusion
newspapers and scientific publications such as "the Guardian", "the
national geographic", "Phys.org", and others started to publish
papers regarding this phenomenon and its consequences. Besides,
although the means for fighting are still insufficient, we can see
some initiatives to involve new or existing companies in the recovery
and treatment of floating and sunk debris. A lot of operations have
started in harbors and tourist areas, and also in the ocean's
currents convergence areas, where organizing them is more
complicated and expensive. However, it is sad to see that most
marine and underwater work professional organizations seem not
interested in encouraging and developing this market and prefer
focusing only on their dream of imposing their standards
worldwide.
Click on the
octopus to return to
the top of the page